GM Ryan Pace loves to preach the constant saying of "we'll draft the best player available." That's certainly the buzz phrase fans have adopted over the past three years. Why? It sounds logical. Forget position or needs. Just find the most talented guy on the board and take him. End of story. This should be the Chicago Bears draft philosophy forever more.
Except it's never that simple. High draft picks are always dictated by need. Always. Did the Bears need a wide receiver when they took Kevin White in 2015? Yes. Yes, they did. They'd just traded Bradon Marshall and had no proven option outside of Alshon Jeffery at the time. That pick wasn't a surprise to anybody.
Did they need a pass rusher when they traded up for Leonard Floyd? Again, yes. Pernell McPhee ended the previous year hurt. Willie Young was turning 30 and the defense lacked a serious degree of speed at the position. Mitch Trubisky? That is the most obvious one yet. The Bears were not entrusting their future to Mike Glennon. Pace says he always looks Best Player Available, but what he really means is the "best player who fits one our biggest needs."
So rearranging things under those parameters, how does the board shift?
Chicago Bears draft eyes must start focusing on Harold Landry
People talk about Quenton Nelson, Denzel Ward, Tremaine Edmunds, Roquan Smith and Minkah Fitzpatrick all the time. If this happens, the Bears will take him. If that happens, the Bears will take him. So on and so forth. That was looking at things under the BPA model. So how about the best player-for-biggest need option? In that context, the entire focus narrows at one position: edge rusher. In case people need a reminder, this is the current depth chart for the Bears at that position:- Leonard Floyd
- Aaron Lynch
- Sam Acho
- Howard Jones
- Isaiah Irving
Landry is being undersold as a potential playmaking pass rusher
Few players were probably more frustrated in 2017 than Landry. He had to play through most of it on a bad ankle, which hampered his ability to get after the quarterback. He'd proven the year before what he can do when having too good wheels, racking up 16.5 sacks and seven forced fumbles. This wasn't against cupcakes either. He had three sacks in a game against Virginia Tech and two against Florida State. He also had a memorable sack against Deshaun Watson and Clemson. Landry can play."He's just like (Vic) Beasley coming out with the way he comes off the snap. You remember how Beasley struggled early because he had to learn to be a pass rusher and not just a sprinter? I think Landry might be the same early on. When he puts it together, he'll do what Beasley did."The general feeling is too many people are getting hung up on his biggest issue. Landry is an average run defender. His mix of limited size (6'3", 250 lbs) and strength make him a weak point in that area. That indeed would be a problem......if this were 1973. The NFL is a passing league. Teams win games on third down and third down is won by getting the quarterback. Landry is gifted at that. It seems the media might not be recognizing this.
Landry is absolutely the player they want. He's got the body and athleticism made for outside linebacker in a 3-4 defense. The tape is there. The production is there and the strong combine is there. Will he be the best player available at #8 overall? Maybe not. He'll definitely be the best player who fills the biggest need.
Comments
Join the discussion below. Keep it civil and focused on the content.
Loading comments...